Jump to content

Timeline of Wikipedia–U.S. government conflicts

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For related articles that are broader in scope, see Censorship in the United States and Censorship of Wikipedia.
A screenshot of the English Wikipedia landing page, symbolically its only page during the blackout on January 18, 2012

Wikipedia—hosted by nonprofit organization the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (WMF)—has been involved with various conflicts with the federal government of the United States. Conflicts have included conflict of interest editing by the FBI and CIA, legal threats from the FBI, allegations of NSA mass surveillance of Wikipedia editors, and proposed laws affecting Wikipedia that have been met with significant backlash.

Since the 2024 United States presidential election, Wikipedia has more frequently been the target of political pressure by government officials in the second Trump administration, especially over allegations of antisemitism due to alleged pro-Palestinian bias during the Gaza war. In August 2025, House Republicans opened an investigation into Wikipedia, requesting unique characteristics of accounts—such as account names and IP addresses—of Wikipedia editors subject to ArbCom actions. This followed a series of actions by the government beginning in April 2025, which applied political pressure to Wikipedia after Trump-affiliated think tank the Heritage Foundation's Project Esther was noted as containing plans to dox Wikipedia editors using strategies such as phishing attacks.

2006: Congressional staff conflict of interest edits

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from United States congressional staff edits to Wikipedia.[edit]
Some edits to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia by staff of the United States Congress have created controversy, notably in early to mid-2006. Several such instances, such as those involving Marty Meehan, Norm Coleman, Conrad Burns,[1] and Joe Biden, received significant media attention.[2] Others, such as those involving Gil Gutknecht, were reported but received less widespread coverage. Biographical information on various politicians was edited by their own staff to remove undesirable information (including pejorative statements quoted, or broken campaign promises), add favorable information or "glowing" tributes, add negative information to opponents' biographies, or replace the article in part or whole by staff-authored biographies.[2]

2007: FBI/CIA conflict of interest edits

[edit]

In August 2007, computer researcher Virgil Griffith released WikiScanner, a public database that correlated anonymous Wikipedia edits with the owners of the editing IP address ranges by cross-referencing WHOIS data. Journalists and bloggers quickly used the tool to identify edits originating from U.S. government networks, including the CIA and the FBI.[3][4]

Reporting based on WikiScanner found that CIA-addressed computers edited the 2003 invasion of Iraq article (including adding a disclaimer to a casualties graphic) and expanded material in the biography of former CIA director William Colby; an FBI-addressed computer removed aerial and satellite imagery from the Guantánamo Bay detention camp article.[5][6] A Wikimedia Foundation spokeswoman said such conduct could run afoul of Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guideline but emphasized that the site is "self-correcting," while a CIA spokesman said he could not confirm whether agency machines were used and that systems were expected to be used responsibly.[7]

Although WikiScanner did not prove who sat at a keyboard (only that an edit came from a given network), its release spurred wide coverage of government and corporate conflict-of-interest editing and renewed attention to Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and undisclosed editing.[8][9]

[edit]

In 2010, the FBI sent a letter to Michael Godwin, General Counsel to the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., accusing Wikipedia of facilitating violations of agency insignia limitations, saying "failure to comply may result in further legal action".[10] Godwin responded to the FBI with a letter saying that "problematic" usage of the FBI seal on Wikipedia is not necessarily "unlawful", citing that the seal was neither an "assertion of authority" nor "intended to deceive", and informed them he would argue his case in court.[11][12] Wikipedia continues to use the FBI's seal on its page about the FBI.[13]

2011–2012: SOPA/PIPA and Wikipedia blackout

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Protests against SOPA and PIPA.[edit]
On January 18, 2012, a series of coordinated protests occurred against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA). These followed smaller protests in late 2011. Protests were based on concerns that the bills, intended to provide more robust responses to copyright infringement (also known as piracy) arising outside the United States, contained measures that could possibly infringe online freedom of speech, websites, and Internet communities. Protesters also argued that there were insufficient safeguards in place to protect sites based upon user-generated content.

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia conducted a 24-hour blackout to oppose the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) and to encourage readers to contact U.S. lawmakers; within days, congressional leaders postponed action on both bills.[14][15][16]

2015–2024: Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA.[edit]

Wikimedia Foundation, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. was a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation and several other organizations against the National Security Agency (NSA), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and other named individuals, alleging mass surveillance of Wikipedia users carried out by the NSA.[17][18][19] The suit claims the surveillance system, which NSA calls "Upstream", breaches the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects freedom of speech, and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.[20]

The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland as the NSA is based in Fort Meade, Maryland.[20] The suit was dismissed in October 2015 by Judge T. S. Ellis III; this decision was appealed four months later to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals by the Wikimedia Foundation.[21] The Court of Appeals found that the dismissal was valid for all of the plaintiffs except the Foundation, whose allegations the court found "plausible" enough to have legal standing for the case to be remanded to the lower court.[22] In further rulings, the District Court, Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court (in declining to hear the case and invoking the state secrets privilege), ruled for the NSA, ending the litigation.[23]

2020–2025: Elon Musk

[edit]

Elon Musk, a major U.S. government figure by virtue of his companies' federal roles and his brief 2025 advisory stint, has repeatedly used his platform to pressure Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF). In January 2025 the White House created the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by executive order; Musk was associated with the effort before later distancing himself that spring.[24][25] Separately, Musk's firms are key U.S. contractors: SpaceX and Starlink/Starshield hold U.S. National Reconnaissance Office and United States Space Force contracts, among others.[26][27] Commentators have noted that this public stature amplifies his criticisms of Wikipedia.[28][29]

In August 2020, Musk told his followers on Twitter/X to "please trash me on Wikipedia", prompting administrators to temporarily lock his biography due to vandalism and edit-warring.[30][31] Earlier he had described his article as "a war zone with a zillion edits."[32][33] From late 2022 onward, Musk repeatedly alleged that Wikipedia was biased or "controlled" by mainstream media or "far-left activists", including during disputes over the Twitter Files and coverage of his own actions; these claims were widely reported and criticized by media analysts.[34][35][36][37]

Musk has mocked Wikipedia's fundraising banners and urged followers to stop donating to the WMF, calling the site "Wokepedia."[38][39][40] In October 2023 he publicly offered "$1 billion" if Wikipedia would change its name to "Dickipedia," a taunting offer he later said "still stands"; media coverage characterized the gambit as an attempt to influence or embarrass the project.[41][42][43][44] Following Musk's 2022 acquisition of Twitter, public speculation and posts suggesting he "buy Wikipedia to fix bias" prompted Jimmy Wales to respond that the encyclopedia was "not for sale"; the WMF later echoed that phrase in fundraising messages.[45][46] Analyses in early 2025 framed Musk's subsequent "defund" push as part of a broader campaign against independent information institutions.[47][48]

In January 2025, after editors briefly described a gesture by Musk at a presidential event as a "Nazi salute", he called Wikipedia "legacy media propaganda" and again urged defunding; Wales publicly rebutted him and invited constructive engagement.[49][50][51] In September 2025, Musk announced xAI was building a new AI-generated online encyclopedia called Grokipedia.[52][53] The project was suggested and named by David O. Sacks at the All-In Podcast conference earlier that month.[54] According to Musk's announcement, it will be an AI-powered knowledge base designed to rival Wikipedia by addressing its perceived biases, errors, and ideological slants.[55][56] Gizmodo compared the plan to the 2006 Conservapedia project.[57]

2024–2025: Project Esther

[edit]
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Project Esther.[edit]

Project Esther is a project of The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., that aims to suppress pro-Palestinian protests and what it classifies as antisemitism. The effort has received support from several evangelical Christian organizations but no major Jewish ones.[58][59] According to The New York Times, Slate, Haaretz, The Forward, and Jewish Insider, Project Esther does not address right-wing antisemitism.[58][59][60][61][62]

Project Esther has been criticized for incorporating antisemitic tropes into its rhetoric.[63] It broadly labels criticism of Israel as terrorism and calls for targeting universities, students, and American progressive politics and politicians.[59] Politico described Project Esther as "a lesser-known blueprint from the same creators of Project 2025."[64] In May 2025, The New York Times found that the second Trump administration had called for or acted upon more than half of Project Esther's proposals.[59]

The New York Times characterized the initiative's goal as "branding a broad range of critics of Israel as 'effectively a terrorist support network,' so that they could be deported, defunded, sued, fired, expelled, ostracized and otherwise excluded from what it considered 'open society.'"[65]

In January 2025, leaked documents from Heritage's Oversight Project detailed a plan to dox Wikipedia editors alleged to be antisemitic. Proposed tactics included using facial-recognition tools, cross-referencing against databases of hacked information, tricking Wikipedia users into visiting sites that harvest IP addresses, and operating sock-puppet accounts.[66][67][68] Slate columnist Stephen Harrison compared the plan to the 2021 doxing campaign by pro-Chinese government editors, which resulted in some Hong Kong editors being physically harmed.[69] Oversight Project director Mike Howell said the investigation into Wikipedia would be "shared with the appropriate policymakers to help inform a strategic response".[70]

Following a month-long discussion, Wikipedia editors decided to blacklist the Heritage Foundation website, meaning attempts to link to it on Wikipedia are automatically blocked.[71]

April 2025: D.C. U.S. Attorney's letter questioning WMF's 501(c)(3) status

[edit]

On 24 April 2025, acting United States Attorney for the District of Columbia Edward R. Martin Jr. sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) alleging that Wikipedia "allows foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda" and requesting documents to assess WMF's compliance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The letter sought materials from 1 January 2021 onward and set a response deadline of 15 May 2025, asking about content-moderation practices, handling of editor misconduct, safeguards against foreign influence, and interactions with search engines and large language model companies.[72][73][74]

National coverage described the inquiry as testing WMF's charitable status; WMF emphasized its neutral point-of-view policy and volunteer-driven model in responses to the press.[75][76] The letter also asserted that WMF "is incorporated in the District of Columbia"; WMF governance documents and public records identify the Foundation as incorporated in Florida.[77][78] In the same period, it was reported that Martin sent a "vaguely threatening" letter to The New England Journal of Medicine, accusing the journal of being "partisans in various scientific debates," and that at least three other medical journals received similar inquiries—placing the WMF letter within a broader pattern of outreach to knowledge-publishing organizations.[79]

May 2025: Bipartisan House letter about antisemitism on Wikipedia

[edit]

On May 1, 2025, U.S. Representatives Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D–FL) and Don Bacon (R–NE) led a bipartisan group of 23 members in sending a letter to Maryana Iskander, CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), expressing concern about antisemitism and anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia and requesting detailed information on safeguards, oversight, and transparency.[80][81] The letter cited a March 2025 report by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) alleging a coordinated, years-long campaign by approximately 30 editors to skew content on Israel-related pages, and referenced recent actions by Wikipedia’s English-language Arbitration Committee that resulted in topic bans for eight editors in the Israel–Palestine topic area.[81][82][83]

The lawmakers asked WMF to describe (1) safeguards against coordinated campaigns or foreign interference; (2) oversight of editors and administrators; (3) measures to prevent antisemitic, anti-Zionist, or anti-Israel bias; and (4) steps to increase transparency, including data on disputes, reversions, and administrator actions, and whether additional AI tools are being considered to enforce policies.[81] Wasserman Schultz characterized the letter as bipartisan pressure on WMF to clarify and strengthen enforcement around Israel-related content.[84] The ADL report referenced in the letter drew mixed reactions; some scholars and commentators questioned aspects of its methodology and conclusions.[85]

August 2025 – present: House investigation of Wikipedia

[edit]

On August 27, 2025, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform—through Chair James Comer (R–KY) and Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation Chair Nancy Mace (R–SC)—announced an investigation into alleged organized efforts to manipulate Wikipedia entries in order to influence U.S. public opinion, citing concerns about foreign information operations and activity linked to U.S.-subsidized academic institutions.[86] In a letter the same day to Maryana Iskander, CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), the lawmakers wrote that "multiple studies and reports" indicated attempts to bias Wikipedia content—including alleged anti-Israel and pro-Kremlin campaigns—and asked for documents and data "as soon as possible but no later than September 10, 2025."[87] The Committee's press release framed the inquiry in the context of Wikipedia's influence on readers and on AI chatbots.[88] Press coverage described the move as a Republican-led probe into alleged bias, with some outlets emphasizing a focus on Israel-related articles and on pro-Kremlin editing networks.[89][90][91]

Document requests and scope

[edit]

The August 27 letter requested materials from January 1, 2023, to the present, including:[87]

  • “Records, communications, or analysis” on possible coordination by nation-state actors in Wikipedia editing;[87]
  • similar materials on coordination within academic institutions or other organized efforts that may violate Wikipedia policy;[87]
  • records of the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) covering editor-conduct disputes and actions;[87]
  • identifying and unique characteristics of accounts (e.g., names, IP addresses, registration dates, user activity logs) for editors subject to ArbCom actions;[87]
  • WMF editorial policies and protocols addressing neutrality, bias, and discipline; and[87]
  • any WMF or third-party analysis of patterns of manipulation or bias related to antisemitism and conflicts with the State of Israel.[87]

The letter cited a March 2025 Anti-Defamation League (ADL) report alleging a coordinated campaign by ~30 editors to skew Israel-related content,[92] and an April 2025 Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab investigation into pro-Kremlin efforts to "poison" AI models and rewrite Wikipedia.[93] Independent reporting the prior month similarly documented tactics to seed LLM training data streams with disinformation via web content and Wikipedia edits.[94]

Responses and privacy considerations

[edit]

Media reports quoted WMF as acknowledging receipt of the Committee's letter and indicating it would review and respond; the Foundation reiterated general commitments to neutrality and content integrity.[95] The request for account-level identifiers and logs drew attention to WMF's longstanding approach to nonpublic user data: WMF publishes biannual transparency reports and states it discloses nonpublic data only in response to legally valid requests, noting that it collects and retains relatively little nonpublic data about users.[96][97]

Reactions spanned support and concern: Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger welcomed congressional scrutiny of alleged paid or state-backed editing,[98] while some commentators highlighted potential chilling effects if editor anonymity were compromised (particularly in conflict-related topic areas).[99] If IP addresses of accounts were provided to the government, they could be used to trace editors' real-world identities.[100][101]

Status

[edit]

As of August 28, 2025, the Oversight Committee's request set a production deadline of September 10, 2025; public hearings or transcribed interviews specific to Wikipedia had not been announced in committee releases, and WMF's formal response had not yet been published.[102][87]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Williams, Walt (January 1, 2007). "Burns' office may have tampered with Wikipedia entry". Bozeman Daily Chronicle. Retrieved February 13, 2007.
  2. ^ a b Anderson, Nate (January 30, 2006). "Congressional staffers edit boss's bio on Wikipedia". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 28, 2008. The activities documented included:
    • rewriting Norm Coleman's article to be more favorable, said to be "correcting errors";
    • removing from Conrad Burns' article quoted pejorative statements he had made, and replacing them with "glowing tributes" such as "the voice of the farmer"; and
    • removal of unfavorable information from Joe Biden's article.
  3. ^ Fildes, Jonathan (August 15, 2007). "Wikipedia 'shows CIA page edits'". BBC News. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  4. ^ Poulsen, Kevin (August 13, 2007). "See Who's Editing Wikipedia — Diebold, the CIA, a Campaign". Wired. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  5. ^ Mikkelsen, Randall (August 16, 2007). "CIA and FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits". Reuters. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  6. ^ "CIA, FBI computers used to edit Wikipedia". ABC Science (Australia). August 17, 2007. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  7. ^ Mikkelsen, Randall (August 16, 2007). "CIA and FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits". Reuters. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  8. ^ Johnson, Bobbie (August 15, 2007). "Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia". The Guardian. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  9. ^ Silverman, Jacob (August 21, 2007). "How the Wikipedia Scanner Works". HowStuffWorks. Retrieved August 29, 2025.
  10. ^ "Letter from FBI Deputy General Counsel David C. Larson to Wikimedia Foundation" (PDF). Federal Bureau of Investigation. July 22, 2010. Retrieved August 15, 2025.
  11. ^ "Letter from Wikimedia Foundation Counsel Michael Godwin to FBI Deputy General Counsel David C. Larson" (PDF). Wikimedia Foundation. July 30, 2010. Retrieved August 15, 2025.
  12. ^ Marks, Joseph (August 3, 2010). "FBI to Wikipedia: You can't use our seal". Government Executive. Retrieved August 15, 2025.
  13. ^ "FBI vs. Wikipedia: FBI has not authorized use of the FBI seal on Wikipedia". CBS News. August 3, 2010. Retrieved August 15, 2025.
  14. ^ "Wikipedia's community calls for anti-SOPA blackout on January 18". wikimediafoundation.org. January 16, 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  15. ^ "Reid Calls Off PROTECT IP Act Vote". Wired. January 20, 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  16. ^ "SOPA and PIPA votes delayed indefinitely". ACLU. January 20, 2012. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  17. ^ "Wikimedia v. NSA: Challenge to Mass Surveillance Under the FISA Amendments Act". aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015. Retrieved March 10, 2015.
  18. ^ Paulson, Michelle (10 March 2015). "Wikimedia v. NSA: Wikimedia Foundation files suit against the NSA to challenge Upstream mass surveillance". Wikimedia Foundation. Archived from the original on March 10, 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  19. ^ Wales, Jimmy; Tretikov, Lila (2015-03-10). "Stop Spying on Wikipedia Users". New York Times. Archived from the original on August 13, 2017. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  20. ^ a b "ACLU, Wikimedia file lawsuit challenging NSA mass surveillance". Reuters. Reuters. 2015-03-10. Archived from the original on March 19, 2023. Retrieved 2015-03-10.
  21. ^ Savage, Charlie (23 May 2017). "Federal Court Revives Wikimedia's Challenge to N.S.A. Surveillance". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2020. Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  22. ^ Nelson, Steven (23 May 2017). "Appeals Court: Wikimedia Can Fight NSA's 'Not Speculative' Internet Surveillance". U.S. News & World Report. Archived from the original on October 21, 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2017.
  23. ^ Chung, Andrew (21 February 2023). "U.S. Supreme Court snubs Wikipedia bid to challenge NSA surveillance". Reuters. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
  24. ^ "Establishing and Implementing the President's "Department of Government Efficiency"". whitehouse.gov. January 20, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  25. ^ "Elon Musk is leaving the Trump administration after leading effort to slash federal government". Federal News Network. May 29, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  26. ^ "Musk's SpaceX is building spy satellite network for US intelligence agency, sources say". Reuters. March 16, 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  27. ^ "SpaceX wins US Space Force contract for Starshield, deepening Pentagon ties". Bloomberg. September 27, 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  28. ^ Talbot, Margaret (March 4, 2025). "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  29. ^ Broderick, Ryan (February 5, 2025). "Elon Musk Wants What He Can't Have: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  30. ^ "Musk 'Begs' Twitter Followers To Trash Him On Wikipedia; Page Gets Locked". Yahoo Finance. August 17, 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  31. ^ "Elon Musk 'begs' fans to 'trash' him on Wikipedia page; gets locked". Business Today. August 17, 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  32. ^ "Elon Musk Says His Wikipedia Page Is 'Insanely' Inaccurate". Observer. December 23, 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  33. ^ "Elon Musk says Wikipedia page is "a war zone with a zillion edits"". Business Insider. December 23, 2019. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  34. ^ "A two day suspension of maybe 7 accounts … Wikipedia is controlled by the MSM journalists". X. December 18, 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  35. ^ "Elon Musk Still Doesn't Understand How Wikipedia Works". Vice. October 23, 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  36. ^ Talbot, Margaret (March 4, 2025). "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  37. ^ "Elon Musk Wants What He Can't Have: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. February 5, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  38. ^ "Elon Musk urges supporters not to donate to Wikipedia after it spent $50M on DEI: 'Wokepedia'". New York Post. December 25, 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  39. ^ "Fact check: Elon Musk urged people to stop donating to Wikipedia". Yahoo News. December 27, 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  40. ^ "Wikipedia's founder hits back after Elon Musk calls for defunding the site". Newsweek. January 22, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  41. ^ "I will give them a billion dollars if they change their name to Dickipedia". X. October 22, 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  42. ^ "Elon Musk offers $1 billion to Wikipedia to change their name to 'Dickipedia'". Euronews. October 25, 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  43. ^ "Elon Musk's $1 Billion Offer to Wikipedia Still Stands". The Economic Times. December 25, 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  44. ^ "Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer still stands". The Times of India. February 23, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  45. ^ "Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales told Elon Musk it is 'not for sale' after bias accusation". Business Insider. December 8, 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  46. ^ "Wikipedia:Fundraising/2023 banners". Wikipedia. 2023. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  47. ^ "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. March 4, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  48. ^ "Elon Musk Wants What He Can't Have: Wikipedia". The Atlantic. February 5, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  49. ^ "Elon Musk, Wikipedia founder clash over 'Nazi salute' controversy". India Today. January 23, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  50. ^ "Wikipedia's founder hits back after Elon Musk calls for defunding the site". Newsweek. January 22, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  51. ^ "Why Elon Musk is calling for a boycott of Wikipedia". Le Monde (English edition). January 29, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  52. ^ Gupta, Aman (2025-09-30). "'Grokipedia': Elon Musk says xAI is working on a Wikipedia rival powered by AI". mint. Retrieved 2025-10-05.
  53. ^ Intern, Wiktoria Gucia Breaking News (2025-09-30). "MAGA Melts Down Over Wikipedia 'Blacklist'". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2025-10-05.
  54. ^ Higgins, Tim (2025-10-04). "Why Conservatives Are Attacking 'Wokepedia'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2025-10-05.
  55. ^ "Elon Musk Plans to Take on Wikipedia With 'Grokipedia'". PCMAG. 2025-09-30. Retrieved 2025-10-05.
  56. ^ "https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1972992095859433671". X (formerly Twitter). Archived from the original on 2025-09-30. Retrieved 2025-10-05. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  57. ^ Novak, Matt (2025-09-30). "Elon Musk's Wikipedia Competitor Is Going to Be a Disaster". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2025-10-05.
  58. ^ a b Deutch, Gabby (October 14, 2024). "Heritage Foundation struggles to find partners in fight against antisemitism". Jewish Insider. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
  59. ^ a b c d J.M. Baker, Katie (May 18, 2025). "The Group Behind Project 2025 Has a Plan to Crush the Pro-Palestinian Movement". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 18, 2025. Project Esther exclusively focuses on antisemitism on the left, ignoring antisemitic harassment and violence from the right.
  60. ^ Tamkin, Emily (November 4, 2024). "The Lie Trump Is Offering Jewish Voters". Slate. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
  61. ^ Samuels, Ben. "Trump-allied Group Behind Project 2025 Unveils Plan to Crack Down on pro-Palestinian Activists, Antisemitism". Haaretz. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
  62. ^ Rosenfeld, Arno (December 6, 2024). "Scoop: Internal Project Esther documents describe conspiracy of Jewish 'masterminds' seeking to dismantle Western values". The Forward. Retrieved January 21, 2025.
  63. ^ Rabey, Steve (January 10, 2025). "Heritage Foundation antisemitism effort recycles conspiracy theories". Baptist News Global. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
  64. ^ Ward, Myah; Senter, Irie (April 6, 2025). "Trump's pro-Palestinian activism crackdown closely mirrors a plan from the creators of Project 2025". POLITICO. Retrieved May 29, 2025.
  65. ^ J.M. Baker, Katie (May 18, 2025). "The Group Behind Project 2025 Has a Plan to Crush the Pro-Palestinian Movement". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved May 18, 2025. Project Esther exclusively focuses on antisemitism on the left, ignoring antisemitic harassment and violence from the right.
  66. ^ Rosenfeld, Arno (2025-01-07). "Scoop: Heritage Foundation plans to 'identify and target' Wikipedia editors". The Forward. Retrieved 2025-01-08.
  67. ^ "Wikipedia Editor Targeting" (PDF). Heritage Foundation (pitch deck), published by The Forward. Retrieved 2025-01-08.
  68. ^ Merid, Feven (March 13, 2025). "Wikipedia's Reluctant Resisters". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved June 4, 2025.
  69. ^ Harrison, Stephen (2025-02-05). "Project 2025's Creators Want to Dox Wikipedia Editors. The Tool They're Using Is Horrifying". Slate. Retrieved 2025-02-05.
  70. ^ Talbot, Margaret (2025-03-04). "Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2025-03-05.
  71. ^ Bandler, Aaron (2025-03-25). "Wikipedia Editors Blacklist Heritage Foundation Following Report of Plan to Unmask Antisemitic Editors". The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles. Retrieved 2025-03-26.
  72. ^ "April 24, 2025 letter from the U.S. Attorney for D.C. to the Wikimedia Foundation" (PDF). The Washington Post (document). April 24, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  73. ^ "Letter from Ed Martin to the Wikimedia Foundation". Wikisource. April 27, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  74. ^ "File: Letter from interim US attorney for DC Ed Martin to Wikimedia Foundation 2025.pdf" (PDF). Wikimedia Commons. April 24, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  75. ^ "U.S. attorney for D.C. accuses Wikipedia of 'propaganda,' threatens nonprofit status". The Washington Post. April 25, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  76. ^ Roth, Emma (April 25, 2025). "Trump DOJ goon threatens Wikipedia". The Verge. Archived from the original on April 25, 2025. Retrieved April 26, 2025.
  77. ^ "Legal: Wikimedia Foundation Bylaws". Wikimedia Foundation. December 9, 2020. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  78. ^ "Legal: Wikimedia Foundation Board Handbook". Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  79. ^ Rosenbluth, Teddy (April 25, 2025). "'Vaguely Threatening': Federal Prosecutor Queries Leading Medical Journal". New York Times. Archived from the original on April 26, 2025. Retrieved April 27, 2025.
  80. ^ "Bipartisan Lawmakers Demand Wikimedia Rein in Antisemitism, Uphold Neutrality" (Press release). Office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. May 1, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  81. ^ a b c "Letter to the Wikimedia Foundation (April 30, 2025)" (PDF). U.S. House of Representatives. April 30, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  82. ^ "Lawmakers press Wikipedia to clarify and enforce editorial oversight to prevent anti-Israel bias". Jewish Insider. May 1, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  83. ^ "Edit wars over Israel spur rare ban of 8 Wikipedia editors". The Times of Israel (JTA). February 1, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  84. ^ "Bipartisan Lawmakers Demand Wikimedia Rein in Antisemitism, Uphold Neutrality" (Press release). Office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. May 1, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  85. ^ Klein, Shira (May 16, 2025). "Is Wikipedia a cesspool of antisemitism? Don't trust the ADL's answer". The Forward. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  86. ^ "Comer and Mace Investigate Efforts to Manipulate Information on Wikipedia". U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. August 27, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  87. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Letter to the Wikimedia Foundation (Aug. 27, 2025)" (PDF). U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. August 27, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  88. ^ "Comer and Mace Investigate Efforts to Manipulate Information on Wikipedia". U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. August 27, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  89. ^ "Republicans in Congress open probe into Wikipedia for alleged bias". USA Today via Yahoo News. August 27, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  90. ^ "US Congress investigating Wikimedia over Israel bias". The Jerusalem Post. August 28, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  91. ^ "House panel probing organized efforts to distort Wikipedia, including entries on Israel". Jewish News Syndicate (JNS). August 28, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  92. ^ "Editing for Hate: How Anti-Israel and Anti-Jewish Bias Undermines Wikipedia's Neutrality" (PDF). Anti-Defamation League (PDF via Jewish Virtual Library). March 18, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  93. ^ "Exposing Pravda: How pro-Kremlin forces are poisoning AI models and rewriting Wikipedia". Atlantic Council – New Atlanticist. April 18, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  94. ^ "Russia seeds chatbots with lies. Any bad actor could game AI the same way". The Washington Post. April 17, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  95. ^ "Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of organized bias". Straight Arrow News. August 28, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  96. ^ "Requests for user information (Transparency)". Wikimedia Foundation. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  97. ^ "Legal: Wikimedia Foundation Requests for User Information—Procedures and Guidelines". Wikimedia Foundation. November 26, 2024. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  98. ^ "House panel probing organized efforts to distort Wikipedia, including entries on Israel". JNS. August 28, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  99. ^ "GOP investigation pressures Wikipedia to reveal identities of editors". Common Dreams. August 28, 2025. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
  100. ^ "Recital 30 (GDPR): Online identifiers for profiling and identification". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 2025-08-30. Natural persons may be associated with online identifiers… such as internet protocol (IP) addresses… [which] may be used to create profiles of the natural persons and identify them.
  101. ^ Patrick Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, C-582/14 ECLI:EU:C:2016:779 (Court of Justice of the European Union 19 October 2016) ("Dynamic IP addresses can constitute personal data where the controller has the legal means to identify the user with information held by the ISP.").
  102. ^ "Press Releases Archive". U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Retrieved 28 August 2025.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Timeline_of_Wikipedia–U.S._government_conflicts&oldid=1326114097"